CIBA IANA actions

[bitbucket-import-issues]

Originally submitted by Brian Campbell (Brian Campbell) on 2021-09-25

The registration requests in https://openid.net/specs/openid-client-initiated-backchannel-authentication-core-1_0.html#rfc.section.16 haven’t been done https://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters/oauth-parameters.xhtml

I suspect that was just a forgotten step during publication.

We need to make the formal request(s) to IANA, with a pointer to sec 16, to have the entries added to the registries.

---

Bitbucket status: new

Bitbucket origin: issue 206

[bitbucket-import-issues]

Originally submitted by Bjorn Hjelm (Bjorn Hjelm) on 2021-09-27

Yes, it’s my action item.

[bitbucket-import-issues]

Originally submitted by Bjorn Hjelm (Bjorn Hjelm) on 2022-09-12

Better late than never. The request was sent to IANA today.

[bitbucket-import-issues]

Originally submitted by Brian Campbell (Brian Campbell) on 2023-02-02

#210 resulted from review of the registration request

[bitbucket-import-issues]

Originally submitted by Bjorn Hjelm (Bjorn Hjelm) on 2023-02-02

Is the comment related to what IANA added to the OAuth Authorization Server Metadata registry based on this issue?

[bitbucket-import-issues]

Originally submitted by Brian Campbell (Brian Campbell) on 2023-02-02

Sorry, it’s all a bit hard to follow. With that comment I was just trying to tie some related issues and emails together.

The OAuth Authorization Server Metadata Registration request is done by IANA and looks okay.

The OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Metadata Registration request has not been done and led to #210

The OAuth Parameters Registration (confusing name b/c it’s a specific individual registry on the page with many OAuth registries but the same name as that one) has not been done and the text in CIBA looks to have a mistake ("Parameter usage location" should have "token request" rather than "token response" I think) that should probably be fixed in errata and the actual eventual registry entry

‌