What is the problem this feature will solve?
When a process ends due to the timeout option of child_process.spawn(), there is no way to know whether that termination was due to the timeout. A SIGTERM is sent to the process, but that's pretty much it.
import {spawn} from 'node:child_process'
const childProcess = spawn('node', ['-e', 'setTimeout(() => {}, 1e7)'], {
timeout: 2e3,
stdio: 'inherit', // no stdout/stderr
})
childProcess.on('exit', (exitCode, signal) => {
console.log({exitCode, signal}) // { exitCode: null, signal: 'SIGTERM' }
})
This makes debugging harder. Some users might be left wondering why the process ended if they don't pay attention to the timeout option.
What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
Having a way to know whether the process ended due to the timeout option. Any implementation would work. Some potential ideas:
timeout event on childProcess
- third boolean argument
timedOut passed to the exit event
- emit an
error event with error.code: 'ETIMEDOUT' on childProcess. This is a breaking change since many users are currently listening for error events, so would probably not be a good idea.
childProcess.timedOut = true
childProcess.timedOut() returning a boolean
What alternatives have you considered?
One could possibly set a manual timeout like the following.
let timedOut = false
setTimeout(() => {
timedOut = true
}, 2e3)
However, it defeats some of the convenience of the timeout option, since that one might as well call childProcess.kill() themselves then. Also, it is slightly unreliable since an unrelated SIGTERM could theoretically have been sent at the exact same time.
What is the problem this feature will solve?
When a process ends due to the
timeoutoption ofchild_process.spawn(), there is no way to know whether that termination was due to the timeout. ASIGTERMis sent to the process, but that's pretty much it.This makes debugging harder. Some users might be left wondering why the process ended if they don't pay attention to the
timeoutoption.What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
Having a way to know whether the process ended due to the
timeoutoption. Any implementation would work. Some potential ideas:timeoutevent onchildProcesstimedOutpassed to theexiteventerrorevent witherror.code: 'ETIMEDOUT'onchildProcess. This is a breaking change since many users are currently listening forerrorevents, so would probably not be a good idea.childProcess.timedOut = truechildProcess.timedOut()returning a booleanWhat alternatives have you considered?
One could possibly set a manual timeout like the following.
However, it defeats some of the convenience of the
timeoutoption, since that one might as well callchildProcess.kill()themselves then. Also, it is slightly unreliable since an unrelatedSIGTERMcould theoretically have been sent at the exact same time.