You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 30, 2023. It is now read-only.
I see benefit for developers and coders in sharing code for the python guis.
If we build the right abstractions it would mean implementers of other toolkits could very easily:
test
documentation
api
even implementation ( see below)
The logic required for going from nvim to a gui could be abstracted away so implementers only have
to add a bunch of methods such as, delete line, insert line etc etc.
Tarruda has mentioned the idea of doing a gtk library in c. We could also implement hooks for wrapping nvim gui c libraries into python here.
I see benefit for developers and coders in sharing code for the python guis.
If we build the right abstractions it would mean implementers of other toolkits could very easily:
The logic required for going from nvim to a gui could be abstracted away so implementers only have
to add a bunch of methods such as, delete line, insert line etc etc.
Tarruda has mentioned the idea of doing a gtk library in c. We could also implement hooks for wrapping nvim gui c libraries into python here.
Is this type of thinking feasible cross language?