Reference-server maintenance workflows can misinterpret CI state, causing incorrect escalation or missed regressions.
Current behavior is insufficient because check interpretation is ad hoc and lacks a normalized machine-readable contract.
Why now: cross-repo operations require deterministic CI state categories (failed, pending, no checks, policy-blocked).
Claim-to-codepath map:
- CI triage utilities in repo scripts/package tasks.
- Classification logic and tests in server tooling test suites.
Requested behavior: implement a stable classifier with fixture-backed tests that cover representative PR check scenarios.
Evidence Packet
- Commit under test: a83b145
- Runtime environment:
- OS: Darwin 25.3.0 arm64
- Python 3.14.0
- go version go1.25.7 darwin/arm64
- Node: v22.19.0
- Minimal repro:
- Follow the repo's current local validation/CI-triage path.
- Observe the behavior described above for this issue.
- Expected behavior: deterministic, documented behavior matching acceptance criteria below.
- Actual behavior: behavior can be inconsistent for the scenario described above.
Acceptance Criteria
- Implement the smallest code change that addresses the proven pain point.
- Add focused regression test coverage for the changed behavior.
- Ensure backward compatibility expectations are explicit in tests/docs.
Reference-server maintenance workflows can misinterpret CI state, causing incorrect escalation or missed regressions.
Current behavior is insufficient because check interpretation is ad hoc and lacks a normalized machine-readable contract.
Why now: cross-repo operations require deterministic CI state categories (failed, pending, no checks, policy-blocked).
Claim-to-codepath map:
Requested behavior: implement a stable classifier with fixture-backed tests that cover representative PR check scenarios.
Evidence Packet
Acceptance Criteria