Highly recommended: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2314853121 Many bencharks against Cartesian ddgs fail to account for the 2.94 scaling described in 2016 Park et al.
Highly recommended: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2314853121
Many bencharks against Cartesian ddgs fail to account for the 2.94 scaling described in 2016 Park et al.