I took a look at your docusaurus-themes skill and noticed you're tackling the pretty common problem of theme customization in Docusaurus—the implementation feels solid at 79/100, but I'm curious whether you considered how theme inheritance might scale when developers start stacking multiple theme layers.
Links:
The TL;DR
You're at 79/100, solid C-grade territory. This is based on Anthropic's best practices for skill design. Your Writing Style is the strongest pillar (9/10)—the voice is consistently instructional and concise. Where you're losing ground: Progressive Disclosure Architecture (25/30) and Spec Compliance (11/15). The gap here isn't huge, but it's preventing you from hitting B-grade polish.
What's Working Well
- Tight layering structure: SKILL.md at 63 lines is lean, and you're using references/ subdirectory correctly with commands.md and components.md staying one level deep. That's good token economy.
- Consistent terminology: You stick with "swizzle," "wrap," "eject" throughout without drift. LLMs appreciate that consistency.
- Real practical examples: The Footer wrap and Navbar wrap examples in components.md show actual patterns, not just theory. That's utility.
- Solid troubleshooting section: commands.md includes a troubleshooting section—many skills skip this entirely.
The Big One: Missing Navigation in Long Files
Your references/components.md file hits 172 lines without a table of contents. For a reference file that long, developers scanning for specific component types (Layout, Documentation, Blog, Code) are going to scroll blind.
The fix: Add a TOC right after the title in references/components.md:
## Table of Contents
- [Layout Components](#layout-components)
- [Documentation Components](#documentation-components)
- [Blog Components](#blog-components)
- [Code Components](#code-components)
- [Best Practices by Component](#best-practices-by-component)
This alone gets you +2 points toward PDA.
Other Things Worth Fixing
-
Second-person voice in references: commands.md says "You want to add functionality" when it should be "Add functionality without replacing original." Minor issue, but it drifts from your otherwise imperative style. +1 point.
-
Trigger phrase underutilization: Your description mentions only "swizzling" but misses obvious discovery paths like "customize theme" or "override Docusaurus." Expand the description to: "Customize Docusaurus themes by swizzling components, modifying theme elements, or overriding default layouts." +1 point.
-
No validation workflow: You mention "test thoroughly after swizzling" but don't give developers a concrete run→check→fix pattern. Add a Validation Workflow section with steps like: run dev server, check browser behavior, run build before deployment. +1 point.
Quick Wins
- Add table of contents to references/components.md (+2 points)
- Expand trigger phrases in description (+1 point)
- Switch second-person voice to imperative in references/ (+1 point)
- Add validation workflow section (+1 point)
These changes push you from 79 → ~84, solidly into B-grade territory.
Checkout your skill here: [SkillzWave.ai](https://skillzwave.ai) | [SpillWave](https://spillwave.com) We have an agentic skill installer that install skills in 14+ coding agent platforms. Check out this guide on how to improve your agentic skills.
I took a look at your docusaurus-themes skill and noticed you're tackling the pretty common problem of theme customization in Docusaurus—the implementation feels solid at 79/100, but I'm curious whether you considered how theme inheritance might scale when developers start stacking multiple theme layers.
Links:
The TL;DR
You're at 79/100, solid C-grade territory. This is based on Anthropic's best practices for skill design. Your Writing Style is the strongest pillar (9/10)—the voice is consistently instructional and concise. Where you're losing ground: Progressive Disclosure Architecture (25/30) and Spec Compliance (11/15). The gap here isn't huge, but it's preventing you from hitting B-grade polish.
What's Working Well
The Big One: Missing Navigation in Long Files
Your references/components.md file hits 172 lines without a table of contents. For a reference file that long, developers scanning for specific component types (Layout, Documentation, Blog, Code) are going to scroll blind.
The fix: Add a TOC right after the title in references/components.md:
This alone gets you +2 points toward PDA.
Other Things Worth Fixing
Second-person voice in references: commands.md says "You want to add functionality" when it should be "Add functionality without replacing original." Minor issue, but it drifts from your otherwise imperative style. +1 point.
Trigger phrase underutilization: Your description mentions only "swizzling" but misses obvious discovery paths like "customize theme" or "override Docusaurus." Expand the description to: "Customize Docusaurus themes by swizzling components, modifying theme elements, or overriding default layouts." +1 point.
No validation workflow: You mention "test thoroughly after swizzling" but don't give developers a concrete run→check→fix pattern. Add a Validation Workflow section with steps like: run dev server, check browser behavior, run build before deployment. +1 point.
Quick Wins
These changes push you from 79 → ~84, solidly into B-grade territory.
Checkout your skill here: [SkillzWave.ai](https://skillzwave.ai) | [SpillWave](https://spillwave.com) We have an agentic skill installer that install skills in 14+ coding agent platforms. Check out this guide on how to improve your agentic skills.