I've been looking at how teams standardize their linting setup, and your eslint-config skill caught my attention—the way you've structured the progressive disclosure is really efficient for something that could easily become overwhelming. With a 91/100, I'm curious what trade-offs you made between comprehensiveness and usability.
Links:
TL;DR
You're at 91/100, A territory—that's production-ready work based on Anthropic's skill best practices. Your Progressive Disclosure Architecture is the strong suit (27/30), which makes sense given the complexity of ESLint configs. The weakest pillar is Spec Compliance (12/15), mostly because your description could use a couple more trigger phrases to help discoverability.
What's Working Well
- Layered reference structure: Splitting SKILL.md (162 lines) from detailed references/rules.md and references/plugins.md is the right call. Keeps the entry point clean while letting people drill down into rule configurations and plugin integrations without noise.
- Practical code examples: Your quick start with flat config syntax and the concrete examples for TypeScript, testing, and production contexts show real understanding of developer workflows. This isn't theoretical stuff.
- Token-efficient writing: 9/10 on token economy—you're saying what needs to be said without the fluff. That matters when Claude's reading this to help someone.
The Big One: Add a Table of Contents
Your main SKILL.md file sits at 162 lines without a TOC. When developers are using this skill, they need quick navigation to "Quick Start," "Core Configuration," "Common Patterns," "Scripts," etc. Same issue in references/rules.md (147 lines) and references/plugins.md (191 lines).
Fix: Add a simple markdown TOC after the title in each file:
<!-- TOC -->
- [Quick Start](#quick-start-flat-config)
- [Core Configuration](#core-configuration)
- [Common Patterns](#common-patterns)
- [Migration](#migration)
- [Scripts](#scripts)
<!-- /TOC -->
This nets you +2 points on Progressive Disclosure (gets you to 29/30).
Other Things Worth Fixing
-
Beef up the description triggers: Right now you've got "configuring ESLint" and mention of flat config/TypeScript. Add one more phrase like "eslint rules and plugins" or "linting setup" to improve how the skill surfaces in searches. Quick +1 on Spec Compliance.
-
Add numbered setup steps in Quick Start: Instead of just showing the config block, add: 1) Install deps, 2) Create config, 3) Add scripts, 4) Run lint. Gives people a clearer workflow—+1 on Ease of Use.
-
Trim some explanation in references: Both reference files have good content but could cut 10-15% of the explanatory text around examples. Keep the configs, tighten the prose.
Quick Wins
- Add TOC to SKILL.md and both reference files → +2 points
- Add 2-3 more trigger phrases to description → +1 point
- Add numbered setup workflow steps → +1 point
- Potential to hit 95/100 with these changes
Checkout your skill here: [SkillzWave.ai](https://skillzwave.ai) | [SpillWave](https://spillwave.com) We have an agentic skill installer that install skills in 14+ coding agent platforms. Check out this guide on how to improve your agentic skills.
I've been looking at how teams standardize their linting setup, and your eslint-config skill caught my attention—the way you've structured the progressive disclosure is really efficient for something that could easily become overwhelming. With a 91/100, I'm curious what trade-offs you made between comprehensiveness and usability.
Links:
TL;DR
You're at 91/100, A territory—that's production-ready work based on Anthropic's skill best practices. Your Progressive Disclosure Architecture is the strong suit (27/30), which makes sense given the complexity of ESLint configs. The weakest pillar is Spec Compliance (12/15), mostly because your description could use a couple more trigger phrases to help discoverability.
What's Working Well
The Big One: Add a Table of Contents
Your main SKILL.md file sits at 162 lines without a TOC. When developers are using this skill, they need quick navigation to "Quick Start," "Core Configuration," "Common Patterns," "Scripts," etc. Same issue in references/rules.md (147 lines) and references/plugins.md (191 lines).
Fix: Add a simple markdown TOC after the title in each file:
This nets you +2 points on Progressive Disclosure (gets you to 29/30).
Other Things Worth Fixing
Beef up the description triggers: Right now you've got "configuring ESLint" and mention of flat config/TypeScript. Add one more phrase like "eslint rules and plugins" or "linting setup" to improve how the skill surfaces in searches. Quick +1 on Spec Compliance.
Add numbered setup steps in Quick Start: Instead of just showing the config block, add: 1) Install deps, 2) Create config, 3) Add scripts, 4) Run lint. Gives people a clearer workflow—+1 on Ease of Use.
Trim some explanation in references: Both reference files have good content but could cut 10-15% of the explanatory text around examples. Keep the configs, tighten the prose.
Quick Wins
Checkout your skill here: [SkillzWave.ai](https://skillzwave.ai) | [SpillWave](https://spillwave.com) We have an agentic skill installer that install skills in 14+ coding agent platforms. Check out this guide on how to improve your agentic skills.