You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
37 CUTEst problems that Ipopt solves (Optimal or Acceptable) but ripopt fails on. These represent the current reliability gap and are targets for future improvement.
Failure Mode Breakdown
Mode
Count
Description
NumericalError
31
KKT factorization or solve quality too poor to continue
RestorationFailed
3
Feasibility restoration could not reduce constraint violation
MaxIterations
2
Did not converge within iteration budget
Timeout
1
Exceeded wall-time limit
Problem Characteristics
Category
Count
Small (n+m <= 20)
12
Medium (20 < n+m <= 100)
6
Large (n+m > 100)
19
Unconstrained (m=0)
11
Constrained (m>0)
26
mu stuck high (>1e-6 at termination)
12
mu reached floor (<=1e-6)
24
Detailed Results
Problem
n
m
ripopt status
pr
du
mu
iters
ipopt obj
ipopt iters
ACOPP30
72
142
NumericalError
3.9e-1
1.0e+2
1e-11
81
5.77e+2
13
CERI651ALS
7
0
NumericalError
0
3.8e+1
1e-11
218
3.35e+2
95
CONCON
15
11
NumericalError
7.3e-12
9.0
1e-11
86
-6.23e+3
7
CORE1
65
59
NumericalError
5.0e+4
0
1e-11
85
9.11e+1
33
CRESC50
6
100
RestorationFailed
1.8e-1
1.1e+7
1.2
16
7.86e-1
194
DISCS
36
66
NumericalError
3.9
1.9e+6
6.5e-2
81
1.20e+1
184
ELATTAR
7
102
NumericalError
1e-13
5.7e+15
1e-11
86
7.42e+1
81
FEEDLOC
90
259
NumericalError
1e-8
1.0e+3
6.2e-6
81
-9.54e-10
23
HAHN1LS
7
0
NumericalError
0
1.5
1e-11
87
3.34e+1
78
HAIFAM
99
150
NumericalError
1.7e-11
8.2e+1
1e-11
130
-4.50e+1
40
HS84
5
3
NumericalError
4.4e-3
6.9e+3
5.9e-4
83
-5.28e+6
9
HS99EXP
31
21
NumericalError
1.6e+3
4.2e+10
1.8e-1
84
-1.26e+12
17
HYDC20LS
99
0
NumericalError
0
5.6e-2
1e-11
2307
2.97e-15
639
HYDCAR20
99
99
NumericalError
5.2e-3
0
1e-1
1
0
9
KIRBY2LS
5
0
MaxIterations
0
0
0
144
3.91
11
LAKES
90
78
RestorationFailed
5.5e+2
5.6e+3
8.0e+1
6
3.51e+5
11
LINSPANH
97
33
NumericalError
3e-2
1.0
1e-11
81
-7.70e+1
24
LRCOVTYPE
54
0
Timeout
?
?
?
0
5.72e-1
33
MCONCON
15
11
NumericalError
1.2e-11
9.0
1e-11
92
-6.23e+3
7
MGH10LS
3
0
NumericalError
0
4.7e+11
1e-11
117
8.79e+1
1828
MGH10SLS
3
0
NumericalError
0
1.8e+3
1e-11
81
8.79e+1
354
MSS1
90
73
NumericalError
8.1e-9
4.8
1e-11
81
-1.40e+1
95
MUONSINELS
1
0
NumericalError
0
7.0e-5
1e-11
82
4.39e+4
8
NET1
48
57
NumericalError
1.2e-5
2.1e+2
1.9e-11
123
9.41e+5
26
OET5
5
1002
MaxIterations
4.6e-2
1.0
1e-11
8
2.65e-3
64
OET6
5
1002
NumericalError
1.2e-4
1.6e+9
1e-11
112
2.07e-3
126
OET7
7
1002
NumericalError
2.6e-3
3.0e+19
1e-11
84
4.47e-5
193
PFIT4
3
3
NumericalError
2.5
9.2e-11
3.5e-11
81
0
190
QPCBLEND
83
74
NumericalError
5.3e-1
5.5e+6
1.1e-6
81
-7.84e-3
19
QPNBLEND
83
74
NumericalError
5.3e-1
5.5e+6
1.1e-6
81
-9.14e-3
18
SSINE
3
2
NumericalError
2.4e-2
2.4e-11
1e-11
125
0
224
STRATEC
10
0
NumericalError
0
1.6e+7
3.2e-2
81
2.21e+3
34
SWOPF
83
92
RestorationFailed
9.6e-1
3.9e+12
8.7e-1
66
6.79e-2
13
TAXR13322
72
1261
NumericalError
6.9e-8
1.4e+6
1e-11
110
-3.43e+2
56
THURBERLS
7
0
NumericalError
0
6.5e-4
1e-11
91
5.64e+3
19
TRO3X3
30
13
NumericalError
1.0
3.1e+8
1.1e-4
84
8.97
47
VESUVIOLS
8
0
NumericalError
0
3.0e-4
1e-11
86
9.91e+2
10
Observed Failure Patterns
Pattern 1: mu at floor, large dual infeasibility (24 problems). mu reached 1e-11 but dual infeasibility is still large (1e0 to 1e+15). The barrier subproblem was "solved" but the NLP stationarity conditions are not met. This is the same class of issue as #7 (iterative z corruption), or it indicates that the linear solver produced inaccurate directions that prevented dual convergence. Examples: ELATTAR (du=5.7e+15), MGH10LS (du=4.7e+11), CERI651ALS (du=38), CONCON/MCONCON (du=9.0).
Pattern 2: mu stuck high, primal infeasible (12 problems). mu never decreased below 1e-2, and primal infeasibility is still large. The solver couldn't find a feasible direction from the starting point. Examples: HS99EXP (pr=1.6e+3, mu=0.18), CORE1 (pr=5.0e+4), LAKES (pr=5.5e+2, mu=80). These are globalization failures, likely needing better starting point strategies or more robust restoration.
Pattern 3: Near-converged but stalled (5 problems). Primal is near-feasible and dual is small-ish but just above tolerance. Examples: HAHN1LS (du=1.5), LINSPANH (du=1.0), HYDC20LS (du=0.056), THURBERLS (du=6.5e-4), VESUVIOLS (du=3.0e-4). These might benefit from the z_opt convergence gate fix in v0.6.1 or from tighter iterative refinement.
Pattern 4: Semi-definite data problems (OET5/6/7, TAXR13322). Few variables (5-7) but very many constraints (1002-1261). The KKT system is very rectangular, creating numerical challenges for the augmented system formulation.
Suggested Investigation Priority
Near-converged (Pattern 3): Lowest-hanging fruit. May already be fixed by v0.6.1 convergence gate or solvable with minor tolerance/refinement improvements.
mu-at-floor dual stall (Pattern 1): Largest group. Root cause is either iterative z corruption (issue Dual infeasibility stalls at ~1e-3 on exp/log objectives #7 class) or linear solver inaccuracy. Better backward error tracking would distinguish these.
Globalization failures (Pattern 2): Needs better starting point strategies or restoration improvements.
Rectangular problems (Pattern 4): May need the normal equations formulation or iterative solver for the constraint-dominated structure.
Summary
37 CUTEst problems that Ipopt solves (Optimal or Acceptable) but ripopt fails on. These represent the current reliability gap and are targets for future improvement.
Failure Mode Breakdown
Problem Characteristics
Detailed Results
Observed Failure Patterns
Pattern 1: mu at floor, large dual infeasibility (24 problems). mu reached 1e-11 but dual infeasibility is still large (1e0 to 1e+15). The barrier subproblem was "solved" but the NLP stationarity conditions are not met. This is the same class of issue as #7 (iterative z corruption), or it indicates that the linear solver produced inaccurate directions that prevented dual convergence. Examples: ELATTAR (du=5.7e+15), MGH10LS (du=4.7e+11), CERI651ALS (du=38), CONCON/MCONCON (du=9.0).
Pattern 2: mu stuck high, primal infeasible (12 problems). mu never decreased below 1e-2, and primal infeasibility is still large. The solver couldn't find a feasible direction from the starting point. Examples: HS99EXP (pr=1.6e+3, mu=0.18), CORE1 (pr=5.0e+4), LAKES (pr=5.5e+2, mu=80). These are globalization failures, likely needing better starting point strategies or more robust restoration.
Pattern 3: Near-converged but stalled (5 problems). Primal is near-feasible and dual is small-ish but just above tolerance. Examples: HAHN1LS (du=1.5), LINSPANH (du=1.0), HYDC20LS (du=0.056), THURBERLS (du=6.5e-4), VESUVIOLS (du=3.0e-4). These might benefit from the z_opt convergence gate fix in v0.6.1 or from tighter iterative refinement.
Pattern 4: Semi-definite data problems (OET5/6/7, TAXR13322). Few variables (5-7) but very many constraints (1002-1261). The KKT system is very rectangular, creating numerical challenges for the augmented system formulation.
Suggested Investigation Priority