-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathflow-test.podspec
More file actions
25 lines (20 loc) · 1.25 KB
/
flow-test.podspec
File metadata and controls
25 lines (20 loc) · 1.25 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Pod::Spec.new do |s|
s.name = 'flow-test'
s.version = '0.1.0'
s.summary = ' A pod to unit-test non-UI flow based on method selectors strings'
s.description = <<-DESC
A pod to unit-test non-UI flow based on method selectors strings.
When writing unit-tests for non-UI parts of an app, say like some kind of local in-memory store, for some scenarios, where there could be multiple ways of arriving at the same final result, basic unit-tests seem insufficient.
`flow-test` makes it explicit that for a particular test, a certain list of methods need to be called, in a particular order, for it to be successful.
DESC
s.homepage = 'https://github.com/gnithin/flow-test'
s.license = { :type => 'MIT', :file => 'LICENSE' }
s.author = { 'gnithin' => 'nithin.linkin@gmail.com' }
s.source = { :git => 'https://github.com/gnithin/flow-test.git', :tag => s.version.to_s }
s.ios.deployment_target = '8.0'
s.source_files = 'flow-test/Classes/**/*'
s.frameworks = 'XCTest'
s.dependency 'Aspects', '1.3.1'
# This is for an issue where XCTest does not contain bit-code. So the whole pod needs to be like this
s.pod_target_xcconfig = { 'ENABLE_BITCODE' => 'NO' }
end