Added a test [5510110] with data y=x^2 for x=[0, 1, 2, 3]. FFX does pretty well, but I expected the exact relationship. In the 4-base model, there are two x^2 terms -- could this be related to the handling of second-order bases mentioned in #5 ?
Num bases,Test error (%),Model
0, 62.4453, 3.50
1, 11.4284, 0.640 + 0.817_x^2
2, 1.6635, 0.0846 + 0.972_x^2 + 0.00984_x
4, 0.7507, (0.0973 + 0.523_x^2 + 0.440_x^2) / (1.0 - 0.00214_x - 0.00168*x)
Added a test [5510110] with data y=x^2 for x=[0, 1, 2, 3]. FFX does pretty well, but I expected the exact relationship. In the 4-base model, there are two x^2 terms -- could this be related to the handling of second-order bases mentioned in #5 ?
Num bases,Test error (%),Model
0, 62.4453, 3.50
1, 11.4284, 0.640 + 0.817_x^2
2, 1.6635, 0.0846 + 0.972_x^2 + 0.00984_x
4, 0.7507, (0.0973 + 0.523_x^2 + 0.440_x^2) / (1.0 - 0.00214_x - 0.00168*x)