Fix: Resolve license inconsistency and broken link in README #1
Description
There is currently a discrepancy in the project's legal documentation that may confuse users and contributors. The README.md mentions specific licensing requirements that are not reflected in the current file structure.
🚩 Identified Issues:
Broken Link (404): The README points to a license file that does not exist in the repository.
Missing LICENSE file: There is no formal license file in the root directory.
Term Inconsistency: The README requires "attribution," but does not specify the legal framework (e.g., MIT, Apache 2.0, CC BY 4.0).
🎯 Proposed Solution:
A final licensing scheme needs to be defined and the following actions taken:
Create a LICENSE file in the root directory with the appropriate legal text.
Update README.md to ensure the link points correctly to the local file, or remove the mention if it no longer applies.
Clarify the attribution clause to make it explicit and easy for users to follow.
📋 Steps to Reproduce:
Open README.md.
Click on the license link.
Observe the 404 error and the absence of the file in the repository tree.