I plan to make a MicroHs version of the primitive package. It mostly consists of wrappers around primitive types and functions (arrays, mutable references, pointers). Since the implementation is very compiler dependent, I don't think it makes much sense to modify the original version. However, MicroHs should already provide all the necessary tools for a reimplementation. Now my question is: Should this be included with MicroHs itself (like bytestring etc.) or in a separate primitive-mhs package?
I plan to make a MicroHs version of the primitive package. It mostly consists of wrappers around primitive types and functions (arrays, mutable references, pointers). Since the implementation is very compiler dependent, I don't think it makes much sense to modify the original version. However, MicroHs should already provide all the necessary tools for a reimplementation. Now my question is: Should this be included with MicroHs itself (like
bytestringetc.) or in a separateprimitive-mhspackage?