| layout | default |
|---|
Everybody makes mistakes. Sometimes, this happens unnoticed. And sometimes, it doesn’t even matter. However, there are some areas where it becomes particularly troublesome when we do so. And science, I think, is one such area. Luckily for us, science (and philosophy, I might add) is a collaborative enterprise. And uncovering mistakes is an integral part of it. In this spirit, I invite you to check and replicate my work. To help you with this, I maintain repositories containing essential files (e.g., data and analysis files) for research projects where I am the first or corresponding author (see publications).
Inspired by Gilad Feldman,1 I offer to pay you a bounty for every minor or major error you find in my preprints and published work. Definitions and rules are taken from the websites of Gilad Feldman and Stuart Ritchie.
- I understand a minor error to be, for example, the incorrect reporting of a numerical result. On the other hand, typos or grammatical errors do not count unless they significantly change the meaning of what is being said. If you find a minor error in my work, I offer to pay you 5 €.
- I understand a major error to be, for example, a flaw in my method, an error in my code that significantly changes the results, or an erroneously drawn conclusion that is not supported by the data. If you find a major error in my work, I offer to pay you 50 €.
As both Gilad Feldman and Stuart Ritchie note, they »have to be objective errors – not matters of opinion or interpretation.« All errors found in my preprints and published work will be collected in a separate section below.
Should you be interested in replicating my work, there are a few things I offer to make this as easy as possible for you:
- For projects where I am the first or corresponding author, I maintain repositories containing all the essential files.
- If anything is missing from a repository, please don't hesitate to contact me, and I’ll try to add the missing files or information if possible.
- If you are working on replicating my work, I will be happy to give you feedback and answer any questions you have.
- Bauer, Alexander Max, Adele Diederich, Stefan Traub, and Arne Robert Weiss (2025): »Correction to: Thinking About Need«, The Journal of Economic Inequality. Link
Footnotes
-
Gilad Feldman got the idea from Stuart Ritchie, who himself adapted it from Ruben Arslan, José Luis Ricón, and the Knuth Reward Check. ↩