Currently it's not possible to use have commands that use the shell capabilities. For example, it's not possible to wrap completely the following command with cron-sentry:
With cron-sentry it would be possible to wrap the ls /dir part, but not the whole thing (unless cron-sentry is executed twice). So, if the ls command works, but mycommand fails, cron-sentry wouldn't catch it.
The above is true for |, ||, &&, >, >>, etc.
Currently it's not possible to use have commands that use the shell capabilities. For example, it's not possible to wrap completely the following command with cron-sentry:
ls /dir | mycommandWith cron-sentry it would be possible to wrap the
ls /dirpart, but not the whole thing (unless cron-sentry is executed twice). So, if thelscommand works, butmycommand fails, cron-sentry wouldn't catch it.The above is true for
|,||,&&,>,>>, etc.