The current implementation of the multi-curve option requires that all infrastructure types are included in the DataFrame for a given vulnerability ID. However, in practice not all vulnerability curve IDs are relevant for every type of infrastructure.
For example, a specific vulnerability ID may only apply to power towers, but not to other infrastructure types such as power plants. At the moment, the DataFrame must still include curves for all infrastructure types, even if they are not applicable.
It would be helpful if the model could allow vulnerability IDs to be defined only for the relevant infrastructure types, without requiring placeholder curves or post-processing of the damage results.
This would make the multi-curve functionality more flexible and easier to use in cases where vulnerability curves are infrastructure-specific.
The current implementation of the multi-curve option requires that all infrastructure types are included in the DataFrame for a given vulnerability ID. However, in practice not all vulnerability curve IDs are relevant for every type of infrastructure.
For example, a specific vulnerability ID may only apply to power towers, but not to other infrastructure types such as power plants. At the moment, the DataFrame must still include curves for all infrastructure types, even if they are not applicable.
It would be helpful if the model could allow vulnerability IDs to be defined only for the relevant infrastructure types, without requiring placeholder curves or post-processing of the damage results.
This would make the multi-curve functionality more flexible and easier to use in cases where vulnerability curves are infrastructure-specific.