Hey Sergey,
after playing around with bindings for a week now (again... never ending topic for me it seems), I discovered that nanobind is a thing now - by the same original author of pybind, and apparently the new go-to way for bindings. Of course, I was a bit skeptical if that was actually necessary, but their arguments seem convincing.
Given that the way that nanobind and pybind work are almost completely identical, I was wondering if you are considering adding support for it. I know you are rather busy, and I also won't have much time to prepare this as a PR (but I could try at some point if you deem it possible), so this is a big ask, but if you think this could be done, that might be an amazing update of Binder!
All the best, and looking forward to hearing your thoughts
Lucas
Hey Sergey,
after playing around with bindings for a week now (again... never ending topic for me it seems), I discovered that nanobind is a thing now - by the same original author of pybind, and apparently the new go-to way for bindings. Of course, I was a bit skeptical if that was actually necessary, but their arguments seem convincing.
Given that the way that nanobind and pybind work are almost completely identical, I was wondering if you are considering adding support for it. I know you are rather busy, and I also won't have much time to prepare this as a PR (but I could try at some point if you deem it possible), so this is a big ask, but if you think this could be done, that might be an amazing update of Binder!
All the best, and looking forward to hearing your thoughts
Lucas