Unresolved Comments from Wind Layout Feature-Adds
This issue includes some unresolved feedback and comments from PR #429, #431, #433, and #435. This issue will get updated as reviews for these PRs are completed.
Unresolved feedback from PR #429
Unresolved feedback from PR ##431
Unresolved feedback from PR #433
Remaining To-dos for PR #435
Unresolved Comments from Wind Layout Feature-Adds
This issue includes some unresolved feedback and comments from PR #429, #431, #433, and #435. This issue will get updated as reviews for these PRs are completed.
Unresolved feedback from PR #429
hopp/simulation/technologies/layout/wind_layout.pyit might be easier to get the rotor diameter as a variable given how long the retrieval call ishopp/simulation/technologies/layout/wind_layout_tools.pyinsubtract_turbine_exclusion_zone: Would it not be more realistic to extend a row/string of turbines than to add a new row if the constraint is not on the cable capacities? Originally posted by @RHammond2 in Intermediate: update to wind layout and floris functions (1/2) #429 (comment)hopp/tests/test_layout.pyadd high level tests for all the layout options (boundarygrid, grid, custom, basicgrid). Also included in Issue Feature request: Expand tests for wind layout methods #434hopp/simulation/technologies/layout/wind_layout.pyUnresolved feedback from PR ##431
hopp/tests/test_layout.pyintest_wind_basic_grid_layout_floris_default: it might be more straightforward to compare the two lists outright by using the assert line as-is, just without the indexing.Unresolved feedback from PR #433
Remaining To-dos for PR #435
write_turbine_to_floris_file()write_floris_layout_to_file()