[launch-core/review] Audit Rootflow and Flow Memory V0 acceptance across PRs

[FlowmemoryAI]

Objective

Review all Rootflow V0 and Flow Memory V0 launch-core PRs against the acceptance matrix.

This issue is complete only when each launch-core requirement has evidence, a linked PR, or a named blocker.

Required reading

• docs/ROOTFLOW_V0.md
• docs/FLOW_MEMORY_V0.md
• docs/V0_LAUNCH_ACCEPTANCE.md
• docs/DECISIONS/rootflow-v0.md
• open launch-core PRs

Scope

Allowed folders:

• docs/
• .github/
• infra/scripts/
• review notes

Forbidden:

• subsystem product implementation
• protocol behavior changes
• frontend implementation
• runtime service implementation

Review requirements

• Map each acceptance row to concrete files, commands, tests, fixtures, or dashboard evidence.
• Identify missing evidence.
• Identify unsafe claims.
• Identify cross-PR conflicts.
• Recommend merge order.
• Keep docs/CURRENT_STATE.md and docs/ROADMAP.md factual.

Acceptance evidence

• Review matrix exists.
• Merge readiness status exists.
• Remaining blockers are explicit.
• No PR is marked launch-complete based only on effort or proxy signals.

[FlowmemoryAI]

Initial acceptance audit added in PR #59 commit e59232f: docs/reviews/ROOTFLOW_FLOW_MEMORY_V0_ACCEPTANCE_AUDIT.md\n\nCurrent status: not launch-complete. The audit identifies missing end-to-end fixture evidence, unresolved canonical schema artifacts, status vocabulary mismatch risk (�erified/ailed vs �alid/invalid), and missing subsystem test command evidence.

[FlowmemoryAI]

Correction to the prior audit note: the status vocabulary risk is verified/failed in the launch docs versus valid/invalid in the current verifier work. The audit file itself is clean; this correction is only for the GitHub comment text.