Question on Act of Consumption definition #826
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
@swartik, I am not sure about the answer to your question. Perhaps @APCox or @mark-jensen can chime in. However, I am planning to jettison the class Resource and revise definitions referencing it. Resource as defined should be a subclass of or defined in terms of Roles. I grant that "resource" can be used as a way of speaking to capture examples such as a "a plot of land" or "group of interns" - as referenced in the examples attached to that class. We aim to be more precise. Moving this to discussion in the meantime. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@johnbeve I'm glad to learn you're planning to reconsider Resource in terms of roles. I'm developing an ontology that treats a resource as a kind of role. I'm still going back and forth on the accompanying processes. I hope others can submit their uses cases. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The definition of class Act of Consumption is:
Does "resource" refer to class ont00000740 (that is, should the label be capitalized), or is the definition's wording only suggestive?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions