Feedback on Lauraceae Juss.

[col-feedback]

The number of genuses is wrong. It is superevaluated, because Lauraceae doesn't have 99 genuses, only 58. It needs to be looked up

---

Source: COL26.2 XR
Name: Lauraceae Juss.
Taxon: https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/314231/nameusage/BTB
Email: https://api.checklistbank.org/admin/email?address=4c8cd294dbc61a8fdde7bcb825ae596d17c13e40cf67607952a6a3394dbf89f3cff27cf0e70e7564be6a20a4d3e6ff67

[yroskov]

Global CoL consists of 57 genera in Lauraceae: https://preview.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/BTB

Seems, XR includes 99 genera https://www.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/BTB

@DianRHR, @camiplata, I am handing this over to you.

[mdoering]

not sure if relevant, but both WoRMS and IRMNG contained many genera wrongly interpreted as accepted names.
I have reinterpreted both so their uncertain/unassessed status maps to bare names now and will thus be removed from tonights XR build!

CatalogueOfLife/coldp#94

[yroskov]

You are right, 42 paleo genera from IRMNG: https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/314231/names?TAXON_ID=BTB&facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nomCode&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=authorshipYear&facet=extinct&facet=environment&facet=origin&facet=sectorMode&facet=secondarySourceGroup&facet=sectorDatasetKey&facet=secondarySource&facet=group&limit=50&offset=0&rank=genus&reverse=false&sectorDatasetKey=2007&status=accepted&status=provisionally%20accepted

They are accepted, but they belong to the past...