Updating roadmap as migration into Polygon CDK has been approved.
Decisions
Need to make decision on 2 things:
- Whether to upgrade cosmos-sdk version:
-
v0.47 (upgrade)
-
bring Cronos’ fork of ethermint back home a.k.a vanilla Ethermint
- absent of stateful precompile contract
- no custom patch on cometbft-db, cosmos-sdk
-
Pro
- MEV (additional revenue)
- Optimistic block processing (sub 1s)
-
Con
- will not last long, less than a 0.5 year
-
v0.45 (no upgrade, current-version)
- Pro
- Bring decentralised Polygon CDK into light faster
- Work to bring existing Canto functionality into Polygon CDK earlier
- Con
- Whether to put measures to mitigate security risk
- Limit outflow of capital through IBC/bridge for the benefit of RWA
Update
FYI our progress with Polygon CDK:
Polygon CDK provides L2 tech stack, allowing zk proof of L1 and trustless bridge to L1
- Shortcomings
- sequencer is centralised
- no verification of L2 consensus by L1
- B-Harvest’s improvement
- decentralised block creation via cometBFT
- L2 consensus verified by L1 zkEVM proof
- enhanced performance and scalability
Our progress has been received favourably by Polygon CTO so far and we are confident moving forward in this direction.
Requesting update
- Any update progress of security audit on liquid staking module ?
- When's onboarding module going Mainnet?
Updating roadmap as migration into Polygon CDK has been approved.
Decisions
Need to make decision on 2 things:
v0.47 (upgrade)
bring Cronos’ fork of ethermint back home a.k.a vanilla Ethermint
Pro
Con
v0.45 (no upgrade, current-version)
Update
FYI our progress with Polygon CDK:
Polygon CDK provides L2 tech stack, allowing zk proof of L1 and trustless bridge to L1
Our progress has been received favourably by Polygon CTO so far and we are confident moving forward in this direction.
Requesting update